| For Hitchens, is an "is" a "want"? |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 October 2009 September 2009 April 2009 March 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 January 2007 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 March 2007 February 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March My Links Canadawide Juan Cole TPM Daily Dish CanucksCathie E-Group vanramblings peace order and good government Calgary Grit True North Gwynn Dyer Public eye declan Sean Progressive Blogs Voice in the Wilderness Tilting at windmills sec 15 tyee one damn thing after another Antonia Zerbisias Buckets of Grewal Blank out Times Accidental Deliberations Heartlands Rick Mercer buckets too Amazing wonderdog The Maple Three The Hive Cindy Silver 7 Cindy Silver 6 Cindy Silver 5 Cindy Silver 4 Cindy Silver 3 Cindy Silver 2 Cindy Silver Cindy Silver Sum Cindy Silver 9 Cindy Silver PR Cindy Silver (blogs Canada) Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2) Liberal Blogs tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog |
posted by: CheckItOut (reply) post date: 09.30.04 (7:27 am) Booze has gotten to Hitchen's shrinking brain. To criticize Bush's bloodbath and miserable failures in Iraq is NOT to want bad things to happen. It is to be cognizant of reality and to want the asshole Dubya who caused them OUT OF OFFICE! posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply) post date: 09.30.04 (12:30 pm) Possibly the rumors of Bin Laden being captured right before the election were spread to stop Democrats from making it a big issue- hurting them posted by: koby (reply) post date: 10.01.04 (5:27 pm) Reply to: therealspartacus007 It is not that I do not think Rove would not stoop to that level. The New Republic’s “July surprise” should have raised a few eyebrows. However, pressuring the Pakistanis to produce a big fish during the Democratic convention and keeping secret the capture of the world’s most wanted man is an entirely different matter. It is unfathomable that they would be able to keep it a secret for long and the potential risks of such a strategy far outweigh any benefit of springing the news on the Democrats at the last minute. The Democrats, of course, recognize this and any speculation to the contrary is just politicking. |
|