For Hitchens, is an "is" a "want"?


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

For Hitchens, is an "is" a "want"?
09.30.04 (4:42 am)   [edit]

In his most recent article for Slate, Hitchens says that things have gotten so bad for the Democrats that some unnamed Democrats are not only entertaining paranoid fantasies about the Republicans harboring Bin Laden somewhere only to trot him out at the right time, but they are actually hopping, at least “subliminally”, for bad news from Iraq. http://slate.com/id/2107193/" title="http://slate.com/id/2107193/" target="_blank"http://slate.com/id/2107193/      


Now, I am sure many people realize that if their boss was to drop dead it would be open the door to a big promotion.  However, realizing this and hoping their boss drops dead are two different things. 


Besides, one could easily accuse the Republicans of having been guilty of same kind of “subliminal” thinking.  For example, it must have dawned on the boys of the Pentagon and Dick Cheney that if Bin Laden were to be caught at, say, Tora Bora, the case war with Iraq would be harder to make.  Maybe this explains why they decided to outsource the task of capturing Bin Laden to the Northern Alliance.     


All kidding aside, one news organization has claimed that the Bushies were guilty of much more than just a thought crime.  According to NBC the administration put the politics of war ahead of the national security. NBC alleges that a few months before the war, the administration had good idea that Zarqawi was in Northern Iraq in a region of Kurdistan controlled by Ansar al Islam. However, rather than striking at Zarqawi the administration decided to postpone an attack until after the war began. The reason being they feared that if the attack was successful, their case tying Al Qaeda to Iraq would be fatally undermined and with that potentially the case for war.  http://slate.com/id/2100549" title="http://slate.com/id/2100549" target="_blank"http://slate.com/id/2100549       

 


posted by: CheckItOut (reply)
post date: 09.30.04 (7:27 am)

Booze has gotten to Hitchen's shrinking brain. To criticize Bush's bloodbath and miserable failures in Iraq is NOT to want bad things to happen. It is to be cognizant of reality and to want the asshole Dubya who caused them OUT OF OFFICE!



posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply)
post date: 09.30.04 (12:30 pm)

Possibly the rumors of Bin Laden being captured right before the election were spread to stop Democrats from making it a big issue- hurting them



posted by: koby (reply)
post date: 10.01.04 (5:27 pm)

Reply to: therealspartacus007

It is not that I do not think Rove would not stoop to that level. The New Republic’s “July surprise” should have raised a few eyebrows. However, pressuring the Pakistanis to produce a big fish during the Democratic convention and keeping secret the capture of the world’s most wanted man is an entirely different matter. It is unfathomable that they would be able to keep it a secret for long and the potential risks of such a strategy far outweigh any benefit of springing the news on the Democrats at the last minute. The Democrats, of course, recognize this and any speculation to the contrary is just politicking.

Your Name:


Your Comment: