| Layton's Failed Toronto Approach |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 October 2009 September 2009 April 2009 March 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 January 2007 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 March 2007 February 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March My Links Canadawide Juan Cole TPM Daily Dish CanucksCathie E-Group vanramblings peace order and good government Calgary Grit True North Gwynn Dyer Public eye declan Sean Progressive Blogs Voice in the Wilderness Tilting at windmills sec 15 tyee one damn thing after another Antonia Zerbisias Buckets of Grewal Blank out Times Accidental Deliberations Heartlands Rick Mercer buckets too Amazing wonderdog The Maple Three The Hive Cindy Silver 7 Cindy Silver 6 Cindy Silver 5 Cindy Silver 4 Cindy Silver 3 Cindy Silver 2 Cindy Silver Cindy Silver Sum Cindy Silver 9 Cindy Silver PR Cindy Silver (blogs Canada) Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2) Liberal Blogs tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog |
posted by: Sean S. (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (1:57 pm) this same old tired argument again? sigh... The NDP is attacking both the Cons and Libs....because they can gain from both... posted by: koby (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (2:44 pm) They should be attacking the government more than the opposition, but they are not even attacking both Liberals and Conservatives in equal measure. They are so fixed on the Liberals that they go out of their way to insulate the Conservatives from scandal. “Damaging Harper and the Conservatives on ethical issues like the Cadman mess mainly helps the Grits, and that’s not in our gameplan.” posted by: janfromthebruce (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (5:16 pm) yawn, there are actually stats that show this is profoundly untrue, but I am sure if lib bloggers say it enough times, they will convince, oh, other bloggers. Yawn posted by: koby (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (6:01 pm) yawn is right. It matters not how many bills the NDP have voted against. They have nothing at stake. Besides, it helps keep the Conservative and NDP narrative alive that the NDP is truly the only opposition out there. Anyway, what matters is not a mere accounting, but who the NDP's various ploys are aimed at, and what they doing in committee. It is obvious to the media and the average lay person alike that the NDP is targeting the Liberals and taking it easy on the Conservatives. The classic example is what the NDP has done to shield the Conservatives from scandal. “Damaging Harper and the Conservatives on ethical issues like the Cadman mess mainly helps the Grits, and that’s not in our gameplan.” posted by: Anonymous (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (6:33 pm) You have no idea what you are talking about, and provide absolutely no evidence to support your conclusions. Your electoral analysis is absolute make believe; the idea that there are any plausible circumstances under which Jack Layton would "barely" hold on to his seat is laughable. What's more, you are obviously trying to paper over the truth when you claim that "[s]o long as Liberals refuse to bring down the government, the NDP’s vote is entirely academic and everyone knows that Jack’s act is nothing but fake bravado." There is not a single serious political analyst who would disagree that the NDP will continue to vote against the Conservative agenda whether the Liberals continue to rubber stamp it or not. Please spare us this sillyness. posted by: Robert McClelland (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (9:46 pm) Here, have a cracker, Polly. posted by: koby (reply) post date: 04.11.08 (10:46 pm) For the rest of the world the following is sufficient: “Damaging Harper and the Conservatives on ethical issues like the Cadman mess mainly helps the Grits, and that’s not in our gameplan.” However, you want me to dig up Musclair and Pat Martin doing their best to shutdown the Cadman mess. >>>>> “the idea that there are any plausible circumstances under which Jack Layton would "barely" hold on to his seat is laughable.” Open those baby blues; Toronto Danforth is not Vancouver East. He won by 7,000 votes less time and 3000 in 2004. Oh and by the way, the NDP were at what 12% in Ontario in the last decimal poll and what 14% in today’s Nikos poll, they got torched in the two by-elections. Let me things into perspective. The NDP is consistently polling above 10-12% in Quebec. Last election they took 7.6% of the popular vote in Quebec. In other words, the NDP is up 5% in province with about a quarter of Canada’s voters and yet they down below what they were in last election. Ergo the NDP is loosing voters in the rest of the country. posted by: 2nbj9as38r (reply) post date: 07.15.08 (9:18 am) hwy28qba 5811olnou0c5 5n2fnhabmql7f2 |
|