The Liberal Party is a Mess


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

The Liberal Party is a Mess
11.26.07 (12:06 pm)   [edit]

The CBC’s At Issue panel nailed it on Thursday.

Andrew Coyne:

“I am not sure anybody knows [what the Liberal party stands for] least of all the Liberals.”

 

Gordan Gibson:

 

“They [The Liberal Party] have got to develop policy and they haven’t.”

 

Rob Russo:

 

“What the Liberal party has become is a party of nostalgia.”

 

Chantel Hébert:

“Sometimes a rebirth [the 2006 Liberal leadership convention] is a stillbirth.”

 

The Liberal Party is a party without a soul, without courage, without direction, and without policy. Above all else, the party is hopelessly conservative.

The center point on the political spectrum is not achieved by splitting the difference between what the NDP say and the Conservatives say. What lies between the two is not fertile ground, but rather a desolate no mans land. The Liberal party brass does not seem to realize this. They love pasting together Conservative and NDP talking points to create a shit mix. Afghanistan is a great case in point. Talking points are not starting points. They are an end points. They must flow from a coherent position

Worse, the Liberals approach is entirely passive when it should be active. They should not seek to occupy the political center but to define what is central to being Canadian and let the Conservatives position themselves on the right of that vision and the NDP on the left. This is a daunting task, but it has done before. What we think of Canada is really the Liberal vision of the country under Trudeau and Pearson.

The Liberals need to again duplicate Trudeau and Pearson approach circa 63 through 68. They have to attract those on the left by proposing universal social programs and they need to bring libertarians under their tent by pursuing socially liberal ends. Finally, they have to tie this too approaches together using pragmatic Red Tory language.

The $64,000 question is what polices to pursue.

Libertarians

  • Legalize Euthanasia
  • Legalize marijuana
  • Long term legalize prostitution

Social Democrats

  • Universal Pharmacare program
  • 4 weeks vacation for all Canadians
  • Universal dental care
  • Universal Child care

Long term preconditions for success

  • Deal with under representation of the cities in the House of Commons
  • Introduce mandatory voting; As long as seniors vote in much greater numbers than young people, Canadian politics will be stuck in the past
  • Abandon special interest politics
 


posted by: CanadianPerson (reply)
post date: 11.26.07 (1:38 pm)

the party is hopelessly conservative. I agree with most of your post, except for this sentence. After the anti-child poverty thing from last week, how can you say that?



posted by: koby (reply)
post date: 11.26.07 (2:35 pm)

I meant tempermentally. Anyway, there was no much new in the 30/50 plan. What was new was the target and not the means to achieve said target.



posted by: himanshufunny (reply)
post date: 02.11.08 (2:07 am)

very nice........
I like your blog.

Your Name:


Your Comment: