Cherniak, Chomsky and anti-Semitism


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

Cherniak, Chomsky and anti-Semitism
03.11.07 (4:13 pm)   [edit]
Cherniak: “While this singling out of Israel can be called "anti-Zionism", the reality is that it is no different than anti-Semitism. It is the singling out of Jews (indeed, an entire country of Jews) amongst all the people of the world for condemnation. I don't see how else you can view it.” 
http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-is-anti- semitism.html" title="http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-is-anti- semitism.html" target="_blank"http://jasoncherniak.blogspot...    & nbsp; 

Anti-Semitism is indeed partly to blame.  However, to offer up anti-Semitism as the phenomena’s ONLY cause is ridiculous. 


 It is quite clear that one of the causes is an unwillingness of successive US administrations to call Israel to the account.  In other words, the US reluctance to play fair and call a spade a spade generates a great deal of discussion.  As the self described leader of the free world, many people are frustrated with US’s unwillingness to treat the issue judiciously.  Another cause is that Israel, unlike Iran, Syria, Jordan and China, is considered to be part of the Western orbit, one of us as it where, and as such is held to a higher standard by countries both inside and outside the western orbit.    & nbsp;  
Cherniak:  “This can be applied to our personal lives as well.” 
http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-is-anti- semitism.html" title="http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/2007/03/what-is-anti- semitism.html" target="_blank"http://jasoncherniak.blogspot...    & nbsp;
      & nbsp;   &n bsp;
To apply this hair brained theory to various groups and countries is bad enough but to apply it to individuals is even worse. 
Cherniak seems not to understand that hotly disputed issues, obviously, draw more discussion than topics that are not hotly disputed.  Yes China mistreats Tibetans, but no one in the MSM media, or the political arena or the blogging community disputes this or would be surprised by it if they did not already know.  Israel’s right to “self defense” is an entirely different matter and naturally enough people are more eager to discuss it. 
As for Chomsky, for someone with political aspirations Cherniak certainly demonstrate a tin ear at times.  Say for argument’s sake, that Himmler was a self hating Jew. There is no evidence that he was a Jew by the way.  Would this little tidbit help make his case, viz., that Chomsky is an anti-Semite, or distract from it?  Look in his comments section and you have your answer.  If he wanted to make the case that just because someone is an x does not preclude them from being an x hater, he could have gone about in a way that would not inflame and distract.  


As for the accusation itself, it rests on some pretty weak evidence.  Be rest assured, many people believed David Irving’s books were extensively researched and most of them were not anti-Semites.  That said, it is very unlikely that Chomsky was truly convinced that Robert Faurisson’s book was based on "extensive research”.  He admitted that he does “not know his work very well”.   That said, if he did believe Faurisson’s book was based on “extensive research” it would be more of a backhanded complement than anything else.  Given his assessment of Faurisson’s work he might as well have said this: “Despite years of extensive research, Faurisson, dim bulb that he is, draws all the wrong conclusions.”      
 

Anyway, as should be clear to anyone, Chomsky’s support for Faurisson is a byproduct of his extreme libertarian view of free speech and is not a byproduct of anti-Semitism.  And this was clear to anyone reading the Chomsky’s essay that is at the center of controversy, viz., Some Elementary Comments on the Rights of Freedom of Expression.    & nbsp; 
 
“Faurisson's conclusions are diametrically opposed to views I hold and have frequently expressed in print (for example, in my book Peace in the Middle East, where I describe the Holocaust as "the most fantastic outburst of collective insanity in human history"). But it is elementary that freedom of expression (including academic freedom) is not to be restricted to views of which one approves, and that it is precisely in the case of views that are almost universally despised and condemned that this right must be most vigorously defended. It is easy enough to defend those who need no defense or to join in unanimous (and often justified) condemnation of a violation of civil rights by some official enemy.” 
 

http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/articles/8010 -free-expression.html" title="http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/articles/8010 -free-expression.html" target="_blank"http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/a...  
 
 

 


posted by: Steve (reply)
post date: 03.11.07 (6:39 pm)

How about5 calling on the Arab nations to account?!

55 + years of failing to recognize Israel!!

55 + yeqars of allowing their Arab brethren to languish in refugee camps!!!



posted by: foottothefire (reply)
post date: 03.11.07 (7:23 pm)

The world is less and less bothered by the ‘anti-Semitic’ label simply because it has been hurled with such frequency and intensity that it has become predictable and expected. The world is growing desensitized to the label. The world is also increasingly less patient with Israel and, more demanding that she lives up to her obligations as an advanced society to rise to above apartheid, butchery and barbarism. Negotiation is the path to the peace she so desperately seeks.



posted by: janfromthebruce (reply)
post date: 03.11.07 (8:09 pm)

There is no way to peace, peace is the way.



posted by: Jenna (reply)
post date: 03.29.07 (12:58 pm)

This is concerning an old post of yours that was full of Stockwell Day quotes..

would it be possible for you to provide me with the authors/name of the articles/page numbers of the quotes that pertain to sex education (and the one about banning books?)

I would be eternally grateful.

You can answer here or reach me at jjohnso6 at connect dot carleton dot ca

Your Name:


Your Comment: