NDP Need to Get in the Game


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 October
2009 September
2009 April
2009 March
2008 November
2008 October
2008 September
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

NDP Need to Get in the Game
09.07.06 (2:23 am)   [edit]

Sure the NDP did not stand up Canada by standing up to Stephen Harper, but the party has fallen down in another more serious manner. The NDP no longer sets, or champions readily comprehensible bench marks that people can get behind. The fight for a 5 day week, for 8 hour day and for universal health care has been replaced by nebulous claim that they are helping working Canadians. As result, the party has been effectively marginalized by the other major political parties and by a right leaning media. Very few Canadians would be able to say on what issues the NDP stand apart. The party does not set the terms of debate; it reacts to it. Worse, more often than not its reaction is reported in the media as an after thought. As long as this continues, the NDP can not justify its existence to progressives on the grounds that it was because of the NDP that certain progressive policies have became accepted by the vast majority of Canadians as good policy. Its only appeal seems to be its ability to play Kingmaker from time to time in, ahem, a Liberal led minority government.

Layton’s Afghanistan position is welcome reprieve in this regard. Layton, for once, is setting the terms of debate and he did so by going around the Liberals left flank. That said, judging from the NDP’s 5 priorities, I very much doubt the party will attempt such flanking maneuvers. The party’s five priorities bare a striking resemblance to the issues the Liberals are Harping on; these in turn bare a striking resemblance to the platform the Liberals ran on in January and lost. And so, outside of Afghanistan, the NDP’s wedge issue for the next election looks like it will be again vote for us; we are real Liberals and not Conservatives in drag like those fake Liberals.

This is too bad. NDP can out flank the Liberals on several other issues and in the process grab headlines. The NDP should promise to legalize marijuana; leave the Liberals to champion a strange and inconsistent mix of stiffer penalties for trafficking and fines for possession; the Liberal position inspires no one and with the prospect of legalization on the table it will grab no headlines. Promise to abolish the senate; that is after all party policy. Let the Liberals stumble over their own tongues trying to cut a path between the Conservative and NDP positions.

As for some readily digestible policy proposals, I have two.

One: The NDP claim to be a socially democratic party and at least 4 weeks vacation is the norm in every other socially democratic country; so what the hell is taking them so long? It is time they made an effort to keep up with the Jones, that is the Europeans, or drop the socially democratic pretense. They are a generation behind. Two: The same goes for public dental care. The NDP should be saying that if the Germans, Brits and Fins etc etc can do it, so can we.

 


posted by: TheRockSays (reply)
post date: 09.07.06 (6:36 am)

The right leaning what??? Just what elements of the media are right leaning?



posted by: koby (reply)
post date: 09.07.06 (9:28 pm)

Declan from Crawl accross the ocean sums up the findings of the 2006 McGill Media study and makes clear that things were no rosier for the Liberals in 2004.
"During the campaign there were 3,753 articles written about the election
in the 7 newspapers studied (The Calgary Herald, The Globe and Mail, The
National Post, the Toronto Star and the Vancouver Sun, La Presse and Le
Devoir)

Of those 3753, 3035 mentioned the Liberal party. Out of those 3035, there were 40 with positive mentions of the Liberal party and 445 with negative mentions of the Liberals, giving a 11 to 1 ratio of negative mentions to positive (slightly higher than last election's 10-1 ratio).

Meanwhile, for the Conservative Party, the figures were 2730 total articles, including 144 positive mentions and 127 negative mentions, for a slightly positive overall slant (the positive mentions were similar to last election, but the negatives were cut in half).

The NDP garnered 2% positive mentions and 3% negative mentions, while the Bloc received 2% positive coverage, 4% negative.

The numbers for the party leaders are quite similar with Martin getting 5
negative mentions for every positive one, while Harper received more
favourable than unfavourable mentions."

It should be noted that Sun Media, i.e., “Conservatives at prayer”, were not included in the mix. In short the notion that the Canadian media is pro Liberal is so far from the truth that anyone who holds it is either an ignoramus or an idiot.


Your Name:


Your Comment: