What Liberal Bias?


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

What Liberal Bias?
06.11.05 (1:34 pm)   [edit]
The notion that the press has it in for the Conservatives and is Liberal friendly is a ridiculous myth that just will not go away. The McGill media study should have put it out of its misery, but alas the ghost lives on.

Off the top of my head I can not think of a single Liberal friendly pundit that receives any kind of airtime. Take the CBC for example; Chantel Hebert, Travers, Andrew Coyne, Paul Wells and even Rex Murphy have been unrelenting in their criticism of the Martin Liberals and not entirely without reason I might add. The problem is that in their zeal they have left Harper off the hook. Apparently, he does not merit any attention at all.

Criticism of Harper is left to the only newspaper that comes even close to representing the views of the majority of the population, viz., the Toronto Star and to those on the right (e.g. Don Martin) who believe that the reason Canadians are down on Harper is that he has had a number of bad hair days of late and that he does not smile enough. It is beyond the comprehension of the National Post that maybe just maybe Canadians do not like Conservative policy and that is why 76% of Canadians still do not back the party, even though the government is mired in one of the biggest scandals in Canadian history.

The Posties are not alone in their incomprehension. Echoing Harper, The Globe and Mail and Vancouver Sun went Postal and warned of a coming apocalypse when the NDP budget deal was first made. It never occurred to them that Canadians actually liked the proposed changes and that populace would see their clamorings for what they where, viz., mere corporate propaganda.

Perhaps the fact that National Post employees have spread across the media like some sort of infectious disease has something do with it. Previously Macleans was only a banal rag that hurt no one, now one risks looking inside at one’s own peril. There may be a John Geddes article inside.

As for the media, the conservative hysteria machine was in fine voice prior to being derailed by allegations of the tapes being tampered with. Indeed, when the allegations first surfaced a CBC panel made up of Coyne and Hebert and the Fraser Institute’s Gordon Gibson completely ignored what they were brought on to talk about and inside focused on Murphy and UD.

Harper apparently wants to get them talking again. The Conservatives believe, a la their Republican cousins, that if they repeat something often enough and sound disgusted enough people might side with them. Someone wants to cross the floor and the Liberals did not slam the door in face. What nerve they have.

Now, let me see what is more newsworthy?, A) conversations between two Liberals and a prospective Conservative turncoat that end off with the Liberals concluding that the two sides where far apart or B) the bizarre, underhanded, unethical and hilarious actions of secret agent Grewal.

Judging by the paltry coverage the Vancouver Sun has given to the latter and the attention they gave to the former, Canwest would probably go with A). Conversely, the CBC, Toronto Star and Globe and Mail, in other words the only half way respectable news organizations in this country, the moralizing of Coyne and Herbert notwithstanding, have seen to have gone with B).
 


posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.23.05 (10:37 am)

Wow.

Either you're
a) Paul Martin himself or
b) Completely brainwashed.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.24.05 (9:40 am)

Name one pro Liberal commentator that is on CBC on a regular basis?



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.29.05 (1:10 pm)

Rick Mercer.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.29.05 (1:10 pm)

Oh wait, I meant to say..

All of them.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.29.05 (10:57 pm)

Reply to: newbie

Ha ha. A comedian was all you could come up with. Good job. Keep reaching.

"All of them."

Good one. Yeah, Andrew Coyne and Paul are buds. Andrew Coyne and Chantel Herbert, Jack Travers, all just love Paul Martin.






posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 01.02.06 (12:36 am)

CHECK OUT POLITISHIRT.COM
Politically incorrect... with style!

Your Name:


Your Comment: