Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2009 October
2009 September
2009 April
2009 March
2008 November
2008 October
2008 September
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
| Canadian Anti-Americanism: Reply to Gatehouse |
| 04.28.04 (2:30 pm) [edit] |
|
"Like the know-it-all neighbour who never misses a chance to bend your ear over the back fence or critique your yardwork, Canada has become the block bore. The "special" status that we once took for granted, able to withstand even the frankest disagreements, seems in doubt. Things between our countries are apparently getting worse all the time. And, the evidence suggests, the attitude problem is almost entirely our own." http://www.macleans.ca/topsto... Only a former National Post reporter could be so arrogant, ideological and out of touch as to place the blame for worsening ties with Washington solely at the feet of Canadians. One of the many failings of Gatehouse’s piece is that he fails to place Canada’s declining opinion of the US into any sort of context. Indeed, he never mentions what other countries think of Bush and company; even though, outside of the US, Bush is one of the least liked US Presidents in history and it is hard to think of a country, save Israel, that has a higher opinion of the US today than prior to George Bush taking office. Several current heads of state have road Anti-Bush sentiment to power, most notably President South Korea’s Roh Moo-hyun in 2002 and German’s Schroeder that the same year. It is not just populations of many of the world’s countries that disapprove of Bush it is also their governments. When John Kerry claimed that he had the backing of several European heads of state, even those on the right recognized (e.g., American Specter) that the right question to ask was not who is on this list but who, if anyone, is not. US journalist Fareed Zakaria, who is hardly a leftist, put the matter succinctly. Bush’s policies have “alienated friends and delighted enemies. Having traveled around the world and met with senior government officials in dozens of countries over the past year, I can report that with the exception of Britain and Israel, every country the administration has dealt with feels humiliated by it.” Another of failing of Gatehouse’s piece is that he makes it out to seem that Canada along with the rest of the world has no real reason to gripe about Mr. Bush. Now, a Bush apologist like Gatehouse might think that the reason British Columbians loath Bush like no other group of Canadians is because we are a bunch of tree hugging granolas and, well, Bush is not. However, the fact that it is no longer viable to cut down nearly so many trees since Bush slapped down a soft wood lumber tariff, which is in clear contravention of the NAFTA agreement, has a lot more to do with our dislike of the man than his environmental policies, which are about as environmentally sound as those of China. Vancouverites also have reason to gripe about Bush setting the US drug Czar on us. Shortly after giving the mayor of Vancouver an unprecedented mandate to set up safe injection sites, Walters told a board of trade audience, in what amounted to a thinly disguised threat not to take things too far, that we were only making matters worse. Just to make sure his message was not misconstrued as the view of a dissenting friend, he repeated the US mantra, which is so out of touch with any sort of scholarly research that it has for some thirty years now served as a pop culture symbol of government imperviousness to reality, viz., that marijuana is as dangerous as any drug out there including heroin and coke. In one foul swoop, Walters had tired to undermine the mandate given Mayor Campbell, challenge the findings of Canadian Senate report declaring marijuana to be less dangerous than alcohol and to derail a plan by Parliament to decriminalize marijuana. Paul Cellucci, another of Bush’s henchmen, was equally disrespectful of Canadian democracy. Despite the fact that it was becoming obvious that it would be politically impossible to for the government to back the US adventure in Iraq without a UN mandate, Paul Cellucci continued to brow beat the Liberals into becoming one of the coalition of the willing. In deed, Cellucci went so far as to politically damage the government by pointing out that Canada was aiding US efforts on the sly in Iraq and the help they we were giving was in many respects greater than what many in the collation of the willing were providing. “The Canadian naval vessels will provide more support to this war in Iraq than most of the 46 countries that are fully supporting our effort there.” Now, that is gratitude. |
posted by: pezgirl (reply)
post date: 04.28.04 (2:52 pm)
very well put. You seem well versed and informed, more than some other people at least :)
posted by: koby (reply)
post date: 04.28.04 (5:08 pm)
Reply to: noguru
“’In deed, Cellucci went so far as to politically damage the government by pointing out that Canada was aiding US efforts on the sly in Iraq.’
Would you rather the government pull the liberal wool over our eyes?
You must be joking. Cellucci rightly pointed out our contribution to the Iraqi war effort, a contribution that was by and large ignored by most of the world, and indeed, unheard of by most Americans.”
Should Canadians criticize the Liberals for doing one thing on Iraq and saying another? That is a good question. The problem is that it is nothing more than a red herring. The point that is being made here is that the Bushies have consistently acted as if Canadian politicians do not need to pay attention to Canadian public opinion and that this is but one glaring example.
“The liberals are done in Canada, thank God. Stephen Harper will be your next federal leader. That kills you don't it?”
Keep dreaming. The latest poll puts Harper’s Conservatives at 26% popular support. It must really piss you off that even with a substantial protest vote that want to be Republican is so out of touch with Canadian public opinion he can not capitalize on Liberal errors and misdeeds.
”Whether you like it or not, our neighbours are the leaders of the free world. At this point in time, there is a wagon in the mud in the middle east. Now, you can do a few things, YOu can sit at the side of the road, holding your chin, you can sit on the wagon, flappin' your gums, or you can get beside your neighbour, and get the damn wagon out of the mud.”
What is your point? That Canada is not helping? As you pointed out, Cellucci said otherwise.
”The left coast of Canada is just as infected with liberalism as the left coast of the United States.”
Whatever do you mean by “liberalism”? The most socially liberal part of the US is not the left coast, but the New England states. That said, pollster Michael Adams and others have found that even these States are far more socially conservative than even Alberta, the most conservative Canadian province.