canada2


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

Conservative's GHG Intensity Plan
09.24.07 (3:45 pm)   [edit]
Companies will be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 18 percent per unit of production over the next three years.

Each year after that, industry will have to achieve a further two percent improvement in emission intensity.

Thanks to these and other measures, Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions from all sources will begin to decline in absolute terms as early as 2010.

Our plan will reduce Canada’s total emissions, relative to 2006 levels, 20 percent by 2020 and 60-70 percent by 2050, but note that basing early targets on emission intensity will allow us to square effective environmental action with the reality that Canada has a growing population and growing economic output.   

Our plan will reduce Canada’s total emissions, relative to 2006 levels, 20 percent by 2020 and 60-70 percent by 2050, but note that basing early targets on emission intensity will allow us to square effective environmental action with the reality that Canada has a growing population and growing economic output.   

http://www.conservative.ca/EN/1004/87147" title="http://www.conservative.ca/EN/1004/87147" target="_blank"http://www.conservative.ca/EN...  

GHG Intensity has been going down an average of 2% a year since 1996.   http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_repo rt/2005/images/fig2_e.gif" title="http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/inventory_repo rt/2005/images/fig2_e.gif" target="_blank"http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/ghg/i...   Meanwhi le GHG emissions went up an average of 1.33% during that same period.  At that rate a 78% reduction in green house intensity would leave Canada in 2050 63.7% above what is it is in 2011!    
0 Comments
 
To the Media
09.22.07 (2:52 pm)   [edit]
You should note 3 things.

 

1) GHG Intensity has been going down an average of 2% a year since 1996 well all the while GHG emissions have gone up 25%.  In other words, proposing that countries set intensity based intensity emission targets that they are bound to meet anyway and which will not only fail to reduce GHG emissions but allow them to continue to go up is not a model for anything.  It is political cover for those wanting to nothing. 

2) It was the Bush administration that first championed emission intensity "targets" and this was only later picked up by Harper. So do not let Harper pass off an old Republican idea as a new Conservative one.   An old Bush talking point is not a “bridge” to Bush.  
3) “The federal government's latest climate change plan is badly flawed and won't help Canada to hit its international climate change targets, its own advisory group says.

The report accuses the Conservative government of using "systematic" exaggeration, "double accounting," “not accurately reflecting” emissions reductions, "important inconsistency" and "overestimated" reductions to produce false conclusions about the effectiveness of its plan.

http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/2 59339" title="http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/2 59339" target="_blank"http://www.thestar.com/scienc...

0 Comments
 
Liberals Need to Unveil Some New Policy and Right Now
09.22.07 (2:44 pm)   [edit]
The Liberals do not have the luxury waiting until an election campaign to unveil new policy. They have to stop the bleeding and the only way of doing is come up with policies that will restore Canadians interest in the party. Besides, election campaigns are unpredictable and bold new policy is just as likely to get dismissed as an act of desperation (e.g., the Liberals proposal to ban hand guns) as it is to be celebrated. Two other points: 1) The blizzard of policy proposals unleashed by all parties becomes like white noise after a while. 2) some policies need time to mature. Such was the case with SSM. As I have said time and again, based on what the polls said the policy was clear looser. The country might have been spilt, but likely voters where not. The older one is the more likely one was to vote and to oppose SSM. The success of policy lay in the fact that pundits, academics and even bloggers ran rough shod over the Conservative position and Conservatives sustained a good deal of collateral damage. Intellectually, morally and legally bankrupt, the critics ground down the Conservative position to there was nothing left but stinking carcass of lies, obfuscations and bigotry.
0 Comments
 
Liberal Party: the Party Canada Forgot
09.18.07 (2:19 pm)   [edit]
The days of pumping out middle of the road, offend no one, please no one, interest no one, policies that are utterly incoherent at their core because they are designed to appeal to both sides of any political divide must come to end.


The Liberals are not going to build a grass roots movement unless they are willing to step on some toes and offend different groups, especially social conservatives, from time to time. They are not going to attract anyone by trying to be all things to all people. Canadians feel no loyalty to the party and quite frankly the Liberals bore most of them silly. This is a party without imagination, conviction or courage. Unwilling to consider talking points yet alone policy not yet sanctioned by focus groups or pollsters, it has become the de facto party of the status quo. Yesterday's mores and yesterday's values are today’s Liberal policy.

The Liberals must seek out controversy rather than run from it. They must do more than just broach issues (e.g., poverty); they must propose readily understandable policies that cut to heart of various hot button issues and they can not wait for an election to do so. They must trot out these policies as soon as possible. They can not afford to slave away in obscurity while the Conservatives dominant the headlines. They can not afford to be merely reactive. They must seize the initiative.


The following are just the kind of policies that will put the Party back on the map.

1) Propose mandating 4 weeks vacation a year


2) Propose including dental care as part of health air


3) Propose Legalizing euthanasia


4) Propose Legalizing marijuana
Part of what made for Trudeau mania was Trudeau's decision to liberalize, if only somewhat, Canada's divorce, gambling and abortion laws, and to decriminalize homosexuality. "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation."   Are these reforms what he is best remembered for?  Of course not.  However, they were proof that he was in tune with the times, history on horse back as Hegal would say.  They helped form part of his advant guard image.  The population wanted change and everything about Trudeau spoke to his willingness to provide just that.   

Where this relates back to today is that the Liberals need to get people interested in the party again and population has the facility and desire to discuss these issues.  The SSM issue should tell the Liberals something.  The party needs to demonstrate to the Canadian people that it is willing to move past polling for policy and is willing to offer up substantive change and there is no better proof of that than showing a willingness to tackle the hot button issues, social Conservatives be damned.     

    & nbsp;  
   
2 Comments
 
Conservatives on the verge of a majority
09.18.07 (2:09 pm)   [edit]

I will repeat what I said before the by-elections. "The Conservatives are poised to pick up a lot of seats in Quebec meaning they will only have to pick up a few more suburban seats in BC and Ontario to win a small majority."

The Bloc is free fall in Quebec and the Liberals have not been able to capitalize, but the Conservatives have. The alliance between the ADQ and the Conservatives also means the Conservatives have a strong ground game there as well.

3 Comments
 
Liberals Need to Rediscover Universality
09.13.07 (6:53 pm)   [edit]
The Liberals need to rediscover universality. Under Mulroney and Chrétien universality died as Stephen Harper duly and happily noted in 1994.
"Universality has been severely reduced: it is virtually dead as a concept in most areas of public policy…These achievements are due in part to the Reform Party.”

Under Martin the Liberals did rediscover universality again – well sort of. They promised to implement a “universal” early childhood education program that would in drips in drabs grow bigger over literally decades with no time line as to when the program would become truly universal. The more the Liberals talked up the need for more child care the more inadequate and lackluster their proposal appeared. Needless to say, piece meal universality is no universality at all and if the Liberals want to capture the imagination of Canadians by promising a universal program they better make sure that they are able to deliver and all at once.
One issue worth exploring is expanding the Canada health care to include dental care. As business picks up most of the dental tab already, the idea of offloading the costs of dental to the public sector will have its supporters even on the corporate right. The coporate tax rates will have to be raised slightly to pay for it, but these increases will be more than offset by what they are currently paying out in terms of employee dental care as it stands.


Another thing the Liberals can do is steal a page from the rest of the Western world minus the US and give Canadians more vacation time. Virtually ever other industrialized gives its citizens at least 4 weeks: Canadians deserve no less.
1 Comments
 
The Conservatives are Better Tactians than Liberals
09.10.07 (4:11 pm)   [edit]

As Red Tory has effectively demonstrated, the veil issue has everything to do with perceived shortcomings in recent legislation and nothing to do with Elections Canada. For example: http://redtory.blogspot.com/2007/09/clues-for-clu eless.html" title="http://redtory.blogspot.com/2007/09/clues-for-clu eless.html" target="_blank"http://redtory.blogspot.com/2...  Still the Conservatives have rightly sensed what the public feels should be the case. In so doing, they have struck another preemptive blow against Elections Canada. This proves once again that Stephan Harper and PMO are masterful political tacticians.

This is marked contrast to Dion. Whether it be the Doan Affair, or his decision to announce the deal with Green Party days after 6 Canadian soldiers were killed in Afghanistan, Dion has proved time again that he has a tin ear for politics. The only consolation for Liberals is that Martin was even worse. Whether it be David Dingwall or BMD, Martin had the unique ability of being able to make an innocent man look guilty and to turn a popular decision into a politically costly one.

If the Liberals are going to win the next election, they are going to have drop Stephen Harper as Mr. Muzzle talking point. Harper’s Achilles Heal is his own caucus. The Conservatives are not blessed with a lot of front line talent. Rob Nicholson is no Irwin Colter. Jim Flaherty is no Paul Martin, John Manley or Ralph Goodale. Peter McKay is no John Graham, or Lloyd Axworthy. Rona Ambrose is no Stephane Dion. Moreover, the Conservative caucus still has plenty of nuts. By painting Harper as one man government and other Conservatives as muzzled and unreliable, the Liberals are inadvertently insolating Harper against the very thing that could most derail Conservative messaging, viz., the ranting of loons or the sure incompetence of his ministers. Moreover, this has over the years allowed the press to paint Harper as a moderate who has successfully beaten down the hard edge elements of the party. The Liberals are going to have to find a way of painting Conservative caucus as being an extension of Harper and not separate from him. Controversial statements should not be painted as missteps but as trail balloons.

 More importantly, the Liberals are going to have to prove themselves to be better strategists than the PMO tacticians. This means more than anything else they are going to have to introduce a series of hot button issues that will result in sustained public debate. The Conservatives might score a few tactical victories, they are after all so much more skillful than the Liberals in that regard, but over the long whole superficial talking points stand little chance of standing up to a waves of public scrutiny. Truth almost always wins a war of attrition. This also means shifting the focus away from their incoherent Afghanistan policy and talking points and onto substantive criticisms of the Afghan mission. Whenever the Conservatives claim progress the Liberals must flood the public domain with facts and figures that paint a less rosy picture. Rhetoric must be met with cold hard fact.

0 Comments
 
Liberals need to change the channel in Quebec
09.04.07 (1:57 am)   [edit]
The Liberals have a choice. Either they can attempt to change the channel in Quebec, or they can continue with business as usual and go down to defeat there. Going Conservative Lite will not work. Dion’s reputation as an arch federalist speaks against it.   The Conservatives do asymmetrical federalism far better than the Liberals and they did it first under Mulroney.   Meaning , the Liberals came off looking like a bunch of Johnny come latelys on Martin. The Liberals must shift the entire focus away from federal provincial relations. Afghanistan and the environment are a start, but the Liberal’s track record hammers them on both files. Moreover, the fact that the Liberals Afghanistan position is not grounded in a coherent critique of the mission’s merits or lack there of hurts the Liberals immeasurably.

My position is clear. As Quebec is the most socially liberal Province and Montreal arguably its most the socially liberal city, the Liberals should seek to become the champion of social liberalism. The more controversial and headline grabbing the issue the better. Indeed, given the fact that the Liberals have virtually no chance outside of Montreal (Hull being a notable exception), this option is particularly attractive. I would like to hear some other opinions.
1 Comments