canada2


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 March
2007 February
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March

My Links
Canadawide
Juan Cole
TPM
Daily Dish
CanucksCathie
E-Group
vanramblings
peace order and good government
Calgary Grit
True North
Gwynn Dyer
Public eye
declan
Sean
Progressive Blogs
Voice in the Wilderness
Tilting at windmills
sec 15
tyee
one damn thing after another
Antonia Zerbisias
Buckets of Grewal
Blank out Times
Accidental Deliberations
Heartlands
Rick Mercer
buckets too
Amazing wonderdog
The Maple Three
The Hive
Cindy Silver 7
Cindy Silver 6
Cindy Silver 5
Cindy Silver 4
Cindy Silver 3
Cindy Silver 2
Cindy Silver
Cindy Silver Sum
Cindy Silver 9
Cindy Silver PR
Cindy Silver (blogs Canada)
Cindy Silver (Blogs Canada 2)
Liberal Blogs

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Bookmark this site!

Tories get Taken to School and now it is time for Summer Vacation
06.25.05 (11:21 am)   [edit]

There are conflicting reports as to who approached whom the week before last. However, both the Conservatives and Liberals acknowledged that they had talks over delaying 38.


Conservative House leader Jay Hill laid out Conservative thinking for the media. First he said that the passage of bill 48 was basically a forgone conclusion. “eventually they're going to get C-48 anyway." (Needless to say, the same could be said of Bill 38 and 38 only effects people in 2 provinces (Alberta and PEI) and 1 territory (NWT).) Thus, "If we were to get a delay of C-38 (the marriage bill) until the fall and perhaps some other concession, we'd be happy." "[One?] [Our?] primary concern of ours is that we get out of the spring session with C-38 not progressing further".


What the Conservatives had to offer the Liberals, Hill explained, was the following: “What we would be looking to do for them is allow [the $4.6- billion budget bill] to go without having a full-court press and pushing them into a position where they would either have to bring in time allocation [a move to choke off debate and force a vote] with the public black eye that always brings with it, or extend the sitting into July.” Peter Mackay clarified Hill’s comments. "We will continue to oppose Bill C-48, but won't pull out all the stops or go to the wall in terms of debate”. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050616.wxsamesex16/BNStory/Natio nal/" title="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050616.wxsamesex16/BNStory/Natio nal/" target="_blank"http://www.theglobeandmail.co...
According to John Reynolds a deal was reached. "We agreed to pass the second finance bill. We agreed to do it last Thursday, but the government reneged on the deal”. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/st ory/CTVNews/1119492141499 _22/?hub=TopStories" title="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/st ory/CTVNews/1119492141499 _22/?hub=TopStories" target="_blank"http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/Art...
As result, he said on Wednesday the Conservatives would attempt to bring the government down over the budget. (Jay Hill and John Reynolds apparently were off two minds as to whether this was possible.) "I expect we're going to have every member in our caucus here [including as it turned out Gurmant Grewal who was supposedly on stress leave] whenever the vote is" "Whether it's tomorrow or next week ... we will have every member here, and this government deserves to be defeated."


Of course, the Liberals passed the budget on Thursday night and the Conservatives led by Peter Mackay and Stephen Harper screamed bloody murder.




Stephen Harper: “When push comes to shove the Liberals will make any deal with anybody. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s with the socialists or with the separatists or any bunch of crooks they can find.” http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServ er?pagename=thestar/Layou t/Article_Type1&" title="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServ er?pagename=thestar/Layou t/Article_Type1&" target="_blank"http://www.thestar.com/NASApp...;c=Article&cid=111964 9810981&call_pageid=9 68332188492&col=96870 5899037&t=TS_Home& ;DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&t acodalogin=yes


(One of these days Harper is going to refer to the NDP as “Communists” and say it in the long drawn out manner in which various US politicians would pronounce the word.)


 


Peter Mackay: “We have to start thinking that Hannibal Lecter is running the government and they’ll do anything they have to do to win.”



(What kind school boy put down is this? It makes no sense. It was reported that there was beer set out for the Conservatives that were planning to stay around and filibuster the bill. I wonder if MacKay had helped himself to a cold one or two or three ….. Toronto Star “On the other side of the Commons, a beer-filled tub was being wheeled into the opposition lobby for the few Tories preparing to sit in for debate on a $4.6-billion budget bill.”)



So, let us review. The Conservatives at first said that if the eventual passage of bill 38 was put off, they would be “happy” and would not delay the “eventual” passage of "the NDP budget". A week later they said they would attempt to bring down the government for “renaging” on deal to delay the eventual passage of 38 in return for not delaying what was they described the week before as the “eventual” passage of bill 48. When the Liberals did pass the budget, the Conservatives implied that it was only possible because the Liberals made a deal with the Bloc to end a Conservative filibuster. 


In a radio interview on Vancouver radio station CKNW, Conservative House Leader Jay Hill went further and claimed that the media had singled the Conservatives out for unfair criticism. The media had made a big deal out of Conservative and Bloc attempts to bring down the government that, if successful, would have resulted in big electoral gains for the Bloc. However, the media had not complained when the Liberals made a deal with the Bloc to end Conservative obstruction in return for Liberals passing a Liberal Bill that did not affect the people of Quebec in any way. SSM marriage is already legal in Quebec.


School is out boys. It is time for summer.

0 Comments
 
Articles of Interest
06.18.05 (11:55 pm)   [edit]

Some articles that may be of interest. 


New York Review of Books:  Tom Franks What's the matter with Liberals?  http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17982" title="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17982" target="_blank"http://www.nybooks.com/articl... 


New York Review of Books: Geoffry O'Brien's review of Michael Moore's 911, Is it all just a dream?   http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17315" title="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17315" target="_blank"http://www.nybooks.com/articl...


The critcal reception of Fahrenheit 9/11 by Irfan Khawaja  http://www.secularislam.org/articles/khawaja20.htm" title="http://www.secularislam.org/articles/khawaja20.htm" target="_blank"http://www.secularislam.org/a...


Rediscovering the Right Agenda by Stephen Harper http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" title="http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" target="_blank"http://www.ccicinc.org/politi...


The Person Debate By Peter Mcknight http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversu n/news/editorial/story.html?id=5ea764b9-ce0f-41d 6-b828-b86dfd83f191&" title="http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversu n/news/editorial/story.html?id=5ea764b9-ce0f-41d 6-b828-b86dfd83f191&" target="_blank"http://www.canada.com/vancouv...;page=1


New Yorker: The Height Gap: Why Europeans are getting taller and taller—and Americans aren’t.  By Burkhard Bilger http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040405f a_fact" title="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040405f a_fact" target="_blank"http://www.newyorker.com/fact...


New Yorker: Northern Light by Hendrik Hertzberg  http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?030707t a_talk_hertzberg" title="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?030707t a_talk_hertzberg" target="_blank"http://www.newyorker.com/talk...


Washington Monthly: Armchair Provocateur: Laurie Mylroie: The Necons' favorite conspiracy theorist by Peter Bergan http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.bergen.html" title="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.bergen.html" target="_blank"http://www.washingtonmonthly....


Slate: The Consciometer What if scientists could precisely measure when life begins and ends? By David Dobbs
http://slate.com/id/2120872/" title="http://slate.com/id/2120872/" target="_blank"http://slate.com/id/2120872/


Slate: Adopting Premises: The sneaky debate over legalizing adoptions by gay couples. By William Saletan
http://slate.msn.com/id/2061789/" title="http://slate.msn.com/id/2061789/" target="_blank"http://slate.msn.com/id/20617...


New York Review of Books: How to get out of Iraq. By Peter W. Galbraith http://www.mafhoum.com/press7/193P1.htm" title="http://www.mafhoum.com/press7/193P1.htm" target="_blank"http://www.mafhoum.com/press7...


New York Review of Books: Iraq: The Bungled Transition. By Peter W. Galbraith http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache" title="http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache" target="_blank"http://64.233.179.104/search?...:Z4Wcf3IPR6YJ:nw08.american.edu/~hertz/Politics%25202 004/Peter%2520Galbraith%2 520on%2520Iraq%2520Aug%25 202004.doc+Peter+W.+Galbraith+bungled+transi tion+&hl=en


Slate: The Buck Stops … Where? Stop blaming your henchmen, Mr. President. By Fred Kaplan http://slate.com/id/2100549" title="http://slate.com/id/2100549" target="_blank"http://slate.com/id/2100549


Slate: Bush's Foreign Fantasy The president thinks the world is safer than it was three years ago. Which world is he living in? By Fred Kaplan http://slate.com/id/2103989" title="http://slate.com/id/2103989" target="_blank"http://slate.com/id/2103989


Senate report on Marijuana Volume 1: http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol1-e.htm" title="http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol1-e.htm" target="_blank"http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/pa...


Senate report on Marijuana Volume 2: http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/Com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol2part2-e.htm" title="http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/Com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol2part2-e.htm" target="_blank"http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/pa...


Senate report on Marijuna Volume 3: http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/Com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol3-e.htm" title="http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/s enate/Com-e/ille-e/rep-e/ repfinalvol3-e.htm" target="_blank"http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/pa...


Vancouver Sun editorial:  Could Canada by a world Leader [marijuana]  http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/besmarter.htm" title="http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/besmarter.htm" target="_blank"http://www.freedomtoexhale.co...   




 

0 Comments
 
Cindy Silver and her Apologist
06.11.05 (2:29 pm)   [edit]

Doug Collins, may he burn in hell, once wrote for the North Shore News.  During the 1990s whenever a federal election rolled around, people from outside the North Shore would smirk and say “Ted White will win again; North Vancouver is Doug Collins country”.  Well, no longer.  Collins is dead, White was defeated and the North Shore News is not quite the bastion of backwardness that it once was. 


 The worst the North Shore News can dish out these days is Trevor Lautens.  Lautens current cause de jour is transforming Cindy Silver from Christian fundamentalist dedicated to saving marriage from Adam and Steve to socially moderate, pluralist, dare I say, liberal.  He seems to want to be to Cindy Silver what Doug Collins was for Ted White. His efforts have not gone unappreciated; Silver at one time linked to the following article on her website.   http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w013005/0212 05/opinion/021205op2.html" title="http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w013005/0212 05/opinion/021205op2.html" target="_blank"http://www.nsnews.com/issues0...   In his most recent column, Lautens has enlisted the help of someone he "admires", Stockwell Day man Ezra Levant.  http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w060605/0623 05/opinion/062305op2.html" title="http://www.nsnews.com/issues05/w060605/0623 05/opinion/062305op2.html" target="_blank"http://www.nsnews.com/issues0... 


If Levant’s name sounds familiar this why: In response to the Young Liberals take on gay marriage, “it’s the charter stupid” Ezra Levant, knowing how well Randy White’s interview went over last year, fired back “its the stupid charter”.  Martin has since offered Levant a cabinet post.


Silver is a lawyer, and according to Lautens, this means that she sometimes takes on unpleasant jobs; however such is the nature of beast; some lawyers must take unpleasant work to make the system work; our legal system is an adverseral one and we are all better for it.  So, she is a defense lawyer you ask.  No.  Pick your poison; Cindy is either a crusader in every sense of the word, or a hired gun in the employ of those wishing to break down the wall between state and religion.  When a child in Surrey was in danger of hearing that it is ok to have two moms “if they’re nice to you and if you like them”, Cindy did her best to see that the book was banned from the classroom.  The same went for One Dad Two Dads Brown Dads Blue Dads.  Yes the book is as innocuous as its title suggests.   When the UN advocated the use of “artificial methods of contraception” and “gender equality and homosexual rights”, Cindy was there to speak out against them.  http://www.fotf.ca/familyfacts/commentari es/070197.html" title="http://www.fotf.ca/familyfacts/commentari es/070197.html" target="_blank"http://www.fotf.ca/familyfact... 


When Adam and Steve wanted to get married, thereby imperiling marriage in some weird and unexplained way, Silver was there to “defend” it.


 So, you say. Sliver is but one of candidate and if she was elected her affect would be negated by the others in her party that do not share her views. Harper has moved the party to the middle. Alas, you are forgetting the Republican elephant in the Conservative living room and the fact that only 8 out of 98 Conservative MPs have ever disappointed Life Site. http://www.lifesite.net/" title="http://www.lifesite.net/" target="_blank"http://www.lifesite.net/   In a paper, entitled Rediscovering the Right Agenda, in which he dismissed Red Tories as not being true conservatives, Harper advocated that Conservatives embrace the moral majority. 


 



rebalancing means there will be changes to the composition of the conservative coalition. We may not have all the same people we have had in the past. The new liberal corporatist agenda will appeal to some in the business community. We may lose some old "conservatives," Red Tories like the David Orchards or the Joe Clarks.

This is not all bad. A more coherent coalition can take strong positions it wouldn't otherwise be able to take - as the Alliance alone was able to do during the Iraq war. More importantly, a new approach can draw in new people. Many traditional Liberal voters, especially those from key ethnic and immigrant communities, will be attracted to a party with strong traditional views of values and family. This is similar to the phenomenon of the "Reagan Democrats" in the United States, who were so important in the development of that conservative coalition. http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" title="http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" target="_blank"http://www.ccicinc.org/politi...  


For those who believe that he abandoned such a platform back in March, check out the way he ended his speech to convention faithful.  “Thank you.  God Bless Canada.”  Indeed, Harper is so enthralled with the Republican example that he seems to have forgotten who it is the PM answers to.  This spring Harper informed Paul Martin that he had been “summoned” to Crawford for a meeting.   


 Pace Lautens, this is what Jeffery Simpson of the Globe and Mail got wrong. He made Silver look like the exception rather than the rule.   Silver is not the type of candidate that keeps Harper up at night; she is the type of candidate he wants.  Harper believes, wrongly in my mind, that by emphasizing social issues he can split the electorate in two and to paraphrase Pat Buchanan the Conservative half will be the bigger of the two.  Say what you will about Silver, one thing is sure.   She is just the type of candidate Rove would employ to get the Conservative Party’s social Conservative base out to the polls.  Her one week nomination run proves it.    


As for Lautens, just in case someone should get the impression that he is just playing devil's advocate, he has spoken spoke about one of Silver's favorite subjects, namely the perils of gay marriage.  "My view: men marrying men? Women marrying women? "Bisexuals" working both sides of the street? Stupid or worse."  http://stgeorgeslowville.org/NorthShoreNews.htm" title="http://stgeorgeslowville.org/NorthShoreNews.htm" target="_blank"http://stgeorgeslowville.org/...   Funny, "stupid or worse" are probably the exact words an ethics professor would use to describe Lautens views on the subject.     

0 Comments
 
What Liberal Bias?
06.11.05 (1:34 pm)   [edit]
The notion that the press has it in for the Conservatives and is Liberal friendly is a ridiculous myth that just will not go away. The McGill media study should have put it out of its misery, but alas the ghost lives on.

Off the top of my head I can not think of a single Liberal friendly pundit that receives any kind of airtime. Take the CBC for example; Chantel Hebert, Travers, Andrew Coyne, Paul Wells and even Rex Murphy have been unrelenting in their criticism of the Martin Liberals and not entirely without reason I might add. The problem is that in their zeal they have left Harper off the hook. Apparently, he does not merit any attention at all.

Criticism of Harper is left to the only newspaper that comes even close to representing the views of the majority of the population, viz., the Toronto Star and to those on the right (e.g. Don Martin) who believe that the reason Canadians are down on Harper is that he has had a number of bad hair days of late and that he does not smile enough. It is beyond the comprehension of the National Post that maybe just maybe Canadians do not like Conservative policy and that is why 76% of Canadians still do not back the party, even though the government is mired in one of the biggest scandals in Canadian history.

The Posties are not alone in their incomprehension. Echoing Harper, The Globe and Mail and Vancouver Sun went Postal and warned of a coming apocalypse when the NDP budget deal was first made. It never occurred to them that Canadians actually liked the proposed changes and that populace would see their clamorings for what they where, viz., mere corporate propaganda.

Perhaps the fact that National Post employees have spread across the media like some sort of infectious disease has something do with it. Previously Macleans was only a banal rag that hurt no one, now one risks looking inside at one’s own peril. There may be a John Geddes article inside.

As for the media, the conservative hysteria machine was in fine voice prior to being derailed by allegations of the tapes being tampered with. Indeed, when the allegations first surfaced a CBC panel made up of Coyne and Hebert and the Fraser Institute’s Gordon Gibson completely ignored what they were brought on to talk about and inside focused on Murphy and UD.

Harper apparently wants to get them talking again. The Conservatives believe, a la their Republican cousins, that if they repeat something often enough and sound disgusted enough people might side with them. Someone wants to cross the floor and the Liberals did not slam the door in face. What nerve they have.

Now, let me see what is more newsworthy?, A) conversations between two Liberals and a prospective Conservative turncoat that end off with the Liberals concluding that the two sides where far apart or B) the bizarre, underhanded, unethical and hilarious actions of secret agent Grewal.

Judging by the paltry coverage the Vancouver Sun has given to the latter and the attention they gave to the former, Canwest would probably go with A). Conversely, the CBC, Toronto Star and Globe and Mail, in other words the only half way respectable news organizations in this country, the moralizing of Coyne and Herbert notwithstanding, have seen to have gone with B).
6 Comments
 
The Canadian West is Dead
06.08.05 (12:30 pm)   [edit]

The West is dead. Larry Campbell and Stephen Harper killed it.

Historically federal politics in BC has been defined by regional animosity towards Ottawa particularly the Liberal Party. Especially contentious has been Ottawa’s willingness to grant concessions to Quebec. BC’s favorite protest party of choice during the 1990s was the Reform/Alliance party. However, the trend predates the Charlettown Accord. BC went NDP in 1988. While the NDP had shown a strong level of support in 1979, 1980 and 1984, the fact that the party went from 19 seats and 38% of the popular vote in 1988 to 2 seats and 15% of the popular support in 1993 suggests that much of the party’s support came from those wishing to cast a protest vote. When the Alliance united with the Tories in 2003, the party lost its status as a Western protest party and some of those who voted for the NDP in 1988 went back to voting for the party again. The NDP went from an average of around 15% in the 1990s to 26% during the last election.


In 2002 Larry Campbell was elected. Trumpeting safe injection sites as part of the answer to Vancouver’s heroin problem, Campbell was given the largest mandate in Vancouver municipal history. Every COPE candidate that could be elected from councilor to school board was. In all, all 8 COPE candidates were elected to city council. In terms of votes, they were 1 through 8. Two NPA candidates were also elected.

It was not just the originality of Campbell’s approach that people liked, but the whole aura that surrounded the man. The lead character in the popular TV show Da Vinci's Inquest is loosely based on Mayor Campbell. Campbell had previously been a Vancouver coroner. This promoted one of the other candidates for mayor to say that she did not stand a chance. She was running against the TV character and not the man.  She may have had a point; the character had championed safe injection sites for years. 


By the way, with that out of the way he now champions the creation of a red light district. 

Campbell and Harper do not see eye to eye. When the Conservatives enjoyed a brief lead during the middle of last year’s election campaign, Campbell warned that the “barbarians were at the gate”. For his part, this past weekend Harper accused certain mayors of being biased towards him. As it was Campbell that grabbed all the headlines, one can be rest assured that it was Campbell and to a lesser extent Toronto’s David Miller that Harper was referring to.

What Campbell and Harper seemingly agree on, though, is that social issues define politics today. The keystone in Harper’s “agenda”  http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" title="http://www.ccicinc.org/politicalaffairs/0601 03.html" target="_blank"http://www.ccicinc.org/politi... is, of course, his party’s “defense” of traditional marriage. For Campbell, it is the liberalization of Canada’s drug laws. Despite a well publicized spat with the US drug Czar, Campbell successfully pushed for safe injection sites. Vancouver is now in the process of providing free heroin to addicts and is looking towards setting up safe snorting rooms for coke users. Campbell does not seem content to stop there. On the front page of the Vancouver Sun today was the following headline: Vancouver to press Ottawa to legalize and tax marijuana. http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversu n/news/story.html?id=6dd7394a-bc0b-4a8 c-ac43-021defc22a55" title="http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversu n/news/story.html?id=6dd7394a-bc0b-4a8 c-ac43-021defc22a55" target="_blank"http://www.canada.com/vancouv...

Following last year's election Harper said that the Liberal strategy has always been "take the rest, screw the West."  BC, Vancouver at any rate, no longer seems to agree with this assessment. In the context of BC, it is Campbell and not Harper who has taken the pulse of Vancouver voters and the numbers show it. The combined PC Alliance vote in 2000 was 57%. In 2004 it is down to 36%. Most polls now put the Conservatives in the mid to high 20s range. The numbers in the Lowermainland are even worse for the Conservatives. It is not inconceivable that if an election was called today the Conservative would be left with only the Bible Belt seats, that lie just south of Vancouver. That would leave them with 6 less seats.  Much to the horror of pundits such as the Vancouver Sun’s Yaffe and Michael Campbell, who has no relation to the mayor, it is the Liberals that gaining momentum. Most polls put the Liberals in the lead with support in the mid 30s, but one poll put support for the Liberals at 47%.


Ironically, when it comes to social issues, BC and Quebec find themselves to be on same side of ideological fence. BC and Quebec ran one two in terms of their opposition to the Iraq war, opposition to missile defense and run 1 2 in terms of favorable attitudes towards marijuana legalization and gay marriage.   

0 Comments